Influence of phonological relevance on top-down and bottom-up processing: a systematic dichotic listening study

Authors

  • Ashwath Yashu Department of Speech and Hearing, SDM College of Medical Sciences and Hospital, Shri Dharmasthala Manjunatheshwara University, Dharwad, Karnataka, India https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8377-4863
  • Kuthirakal Rohith Department of Speech and Hearing, SDM College of Medical Sciences and Hospital, Shri Dharmasthala Manjunatheshwara University, Dharwad, Karnataka, India
  • Wasim Ahmed Department of Speech and Hearing, SDM College of Medical Sciences and Hospital, Shri Dharmasthala Manjunatheshwara University, Dharwad, Karnataka, India https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6065-372X
  • Mayur Bhat Department of Audiology and Speech Language Pathology, Kasturba Medical College Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31117/neuroscirn.v9i2.540

Keywords:

Dichotic listening, Free recall, Forced attention, Phonemic relevance, Right ear advantage

Abstract

Dichotic listening (DL) is a test where auditory stimuli are presented simultaneously to each ear. It is sensitive to hemisphere differences and has been used to study language lateralisation. Recently, dichotic tests have been widely used to study the influence of attention on speech laterality in various disordered populations. The study aims to examine the effect of phonemic relevance on dichotic perception in Kannada. This study was carried out in two phases. Phase 1 aimed to develop and validate a Dichotic word list in Kannada, and Phase 2 involved data collection. Two lists of dichotic pairs were developed and tested with 25 adults across three conditions (free recall, forced right, and forced left). Results showed significant differences in ear responses during the free recall condition, indicating a right-ear advantage. Further, the results showed reduced dichotic performance for phonemically relevant pairs compared to the irrelevant pairs. The findings demonstrated that the right ear advantage can be precisely obtained by increasing the linguistic complexity of dichotic pairs. The addition of phonemic relevance would enhance the clinical utility of dichotic testing for assessing linguistic deficits across various disordered populations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmed, W., Giridhar, P. P., & Krishnan, G. (2022). Development and validation of a novel corpus of 269 verb pictures in Kannada based on an argument structure taxonomy. Behavior Research Methods, 54(3), 1358–1373. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01662-x

Arciuli, J., Rankine, T., & Monaghan, P. (2010). Auditory discrimination of voice-onset time and its relationship with reading ability. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition, 15(3), 343–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576500902799671

Bhat, M., Palaniswamy, H. P., Varsha, U., & Krishna, Y. (2021). Development and validation of an automated dichotic double word test in Indian English using MATLAB. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 144, 110697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2021.110697

Brown, K., & Ogilvie, S. (2010). Concise encyclopedia of languages of the world: Elsevier.

Dsouza, S. C., Jyotsna, C. S., Rohith, K., Yashu, M. A., & Bhat, M. (2024). Development and Validation of Quadri Condition Dichotic Double Word Test in Kannada. Audiology and Neurotology, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1159/000541598

Fuente, A., McPherson, B., Chiang, L. P., & Tang, C. H. (2007). Cantonese Dichotic Digit Test: Test Creation and Normative Values for Children and Adults. Asia Pacific Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing, 10(2), 105–122. https://doi.org/10.1179/136132807805297602

Hickok, G. (2009). The cortical organization of phonological processing. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The Cognitive Neurosciences (4th ed.). MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/8029.003.0068

Hugdahl, K., Brønnick, K., Kyllingsbrk, S., Law, I., Gade, A., & Paulson, O. B. (1999). Brain activation during dichotic presentations of consonant-vowel and musical instrument stimuli: a 15 O-PET study fn2. Neuropsychologia, 37(4), 431–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(98)00101-8

Hugdahl, K., Law, I., Kyllingsbaek, S., Brønnick, K., Gade, A., & Paulson, O. B. (2000). Effects of attention on dichotic listening: an 15O-PET study. Human Brain Mapping, 10(2), 87–97. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0193(200006)10:2<87::aid-hbm50>3.0.co;2-v

Hugdahl, K., Rund, B. jørn R., Lund, A., Asbjørnsen, A., Egeland, J., Landrø, N. I., Roness, A., Stordal, K. I., & Sundet, K. (2003). Attentional and executive dysfunctions in schizophrenia and depression: evidence from dichotic listening performance. Biological Psychiatry, 53(7), 609–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3223(02)01598-6

Hugdahl, K., Westerhausen, R., Alho, K., Medvedev, S., Laine, M., & Hämäläinen, H. (2009). Attention and cognitive control: Unfolding the dichotic listening story. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 50(1), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2008.00676.x

Josse, G., & Tzourio-Mazoyer, N. (2004). Hemispheric specialization for language. Brain Research Reviews, 44(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresrev.2003.10.001

Kimura, D. (1961). Cerebral dominance and the perception of verbal stimuli. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 15(3), 166–171. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0083219

Kimura, D. (1967). Functional Asymmetry of the Brain in Dichotic Listening. Cortex, 3(2), 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(67)80010-8

Pisoni, D. B., & Mcnabb, S. D. (2014). Dichotic Interactions of Speech Sounds and Phonetic Feature Processing. Brain and Language, 1(4), 351–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(74)90012-1

Shinn, J. B., Baran, J. A., Moncrieff, D. W., & Musiek, F. E. (2005). Differential Attention Effects on Dichotic Listening. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 16(04), 205–218. https://doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.16.4.2

Strouse, A., & Wilson, R. H. (1999). Recognition of One-, Two-, and Three-Pair Dichotic Digits under Free and Directed Recall. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 10(10), 557–571. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1748546

Trejo-Martínez, D., Manjarrez-Garduño, D. A., Becerril-Montes, H., Granados-Domínguez, L., & Velasco-Monroy, A. L. (2018). Language lateralisation through dichotic listening in a group of patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. Revista Médica Del Hospital General de México, 81(4), 190–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hgmx.2017.05.006

Voyer, D., & Ingram, J. (2005). Attention, reliability, and validity of perceptual asymmetries in the fused dichotic words test. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition, 10(6), 545–561. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576500442000292

Westerhausen, R., Fabri, M., & Hausmann, M. (2023). Dichotic-listening performance after complete callosotomy: No relief from left-ear extinction by selective attention. Neuropsychologia, 188, 108627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2023.108627

Westerhausen, R., & Hugdahl, K. (2008). The corpus callosum in dichotic listening studies of hemispheric asymmetry: A review of clinical and experimental evidence. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 32(5), 1044–1054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.04.005

Downloads

Published

2026-06-22

How to Cite

Yashu, A., Rohith, K., Ahmed, W., & Bhat, M. (2026). Influence of phonological relevance on top-down and bottom-up processing: a systematic dichotic listening study. Neuroscience Research Notes, 9(2), 540.1–540.8. https://doi.org/10.31117/neuroscirn.v9i2.540