Effects of action observation therapy for gait training in stroke: a scoping review

Authors

  • Leonard Protasius Plijoly Sabah Rehabilitation Research & Service Group, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Sabah, Malaysia
  • Fatimah Ahmedy Sabah Rehabilitation Research & Service Group, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Sabah, Malaysia
  • Natiara Mohamad Hashim Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Nyein Yin Khin Sabah Rehabilitation Research & Service Group, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Sabah, Malaysia
  • Alvin Oliver Payus Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Sabah, Malaysia
  • Dg. Maryama Ag. Daud HEAL Unit, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Sabah, Malaysia
  • Candace Xiao Huey Goh 1) Sabah Rehabilitation Research & Service Group, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Sabah, Malaysia 2) Physiotherapy Unit, Hospital Beaufort, Sabah, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31117/neuroscirn.v7i2.304

Keywords:

Action observation therapy, Gait training, Stroke rehabilitation

Abstract

Action observation therapy (AOT) is a rehabilitation approach integrating sensory perception of motor skills among stroke survivors. This review article aims to investigate the effectiveness of AOT for gait training among comparative studies in stroke rehabilitation. We searched through MEDLINE, Scopus, and Google Scholar using the following subsets of terms: 'stroke' AND 'gait' AND 'action observation.' Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCT studies focusing on AOT for gait training in stroke patients were included. Eleven RCTs and one non-RCT study met the inclusion criteria and were included for analysis. Data were extracted on sample size, inclusion criteria, type of intervention, functional outcome measures, gait parameters, and intervention effectiveness. Overall, AOT demonstrated positive results as an adjunctive intervention for improving gait properties among stroke individuals. The review highlighted its neurophysiological mechanisms and benefits in stroke rehabilitation. AOT shows promise as a beneficial adjunctive intervention for improving gait properties among stroke individuals. Further research is warranted to explore its optimal implementation and long-term effects in stroke rehabilitation.

References

Algurén, B., Lundgren-Nilsson, Å., & Sunnerhagen, K. S. (2010). Functioning of stroke survivors – A validation of the ICF core set for stroke in Sweden. Disability and Rehabilitation, 32(7), 551–559. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638280903186335

Bae, S., Lee, J., & Lee, B. (2020). Effect of an EMG–FES interface on ankle joint training combined with real-time feedback on balance and gait in patients with stroke hemiparesis. Healthcare, 8(3), 292. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8030292

Bang, D., Shin, W., Kim, S., & Choi, J. (2013). The effects of action observational training on walking ability in chronic stroke patients: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Clinical Rehabilitation, 27(12), 1118–1125. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215513501528

Bernhardt, J., Hayward, K. S., Kwakkel, G., Ward, N. S., Wolf, S. L., Borschmann, K., Krakauer, J. W., Boyd, L. A., Carmichael, S. T., Corbett, D., & Cramer, S. C. (2017). Agreed definitions and a shared vision for new standards in stroke recovery research: the stroke recovery and rehabilitation roundtable taskforce. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 31(9), 793–799. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968317732668

Beyaert, C., Vasa, R., & Frykberg, G. E. (2015). Gait post-stroke: pathophysiology and rehabilitation strategies. Neurophysiologie Clinique, 45(4–5), 335–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucli.2015.09.005

Braun, R. G., & Wittenberg, G. F. (2021). Motor recovery: how rehabilitation techniques and technologies can enhance recovery and neuroplasticity. Seminars in Neurology, 41(02), 167–176. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1725138

Buurke, J. H., Nene, A. V., Kwakkel, G., Erren-Wolters, V., IJzerman, M. J., & Hermens, H. J. (2008). Recovery of GAIT after stroke: What changes? Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 22(6), 676–683. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968308317972

De Sousa, D. G., Harvey, L. A., Dorsch, S., Varettas, B., Jamieson, S., Murphy, A., & Giaccari, S. (2019). Two weeks of intensive sit-to-stand training in addition to usual care improves sit-to-stand ability in people who are unable to stand up independently after stroke: a randomised trial. Journal of Physiotherapy, 65(3), 152–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphys.2019.05.007

Donkor, E. S. (2018). Stroke in the 21st century: a snapshot of the burden, epidemiology, and quality of life. Stroke Research and Treatment, 2018, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3238165

Hioka, A., Tada, Y., Kitazato, K., Akazawa, N., Takagi, Y., & Nagahiro, S. (2020). Action observation treatment improves gait ability in subacute to convalescent stroke patients. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, 75, 55–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2020.03.031

Hyndman, D., Ashburn, A., & Stack, E. (2002). Fall events among people with stroke living in the community: Circumstances of falls and characteristics of fallers. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 83(2), 165–170. https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2002.28030

Jaracz, K., & Kozubski, W. (2003). Quality of life in stroke patients. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 107(5), 324–329. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0404.2003.02078.x

Jørgensen, H. S., Nakayama, H., Raaschou, H. O., Vive-Larsen, J., Støier, M., & Olsen, T. S. (1995). Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part II: Time course of recovery. The copenhagen stroke study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 76(5), 406–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-9993(95)80568-0

Kim, E., & Sang-MiChung, O. (2016). The effects of group action observation training for patients with chronic stroke on the balance and gait. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7c744cb22aba7594dcf5ac5a9f4dd239098f03d9

Kim, J., & Lee, B. (2013). Action observation training for functional activities after stroke: A pilot randomized controlled trial. NeuroRehabilitation, 33(4), 565–574. https://doi.org/10.3233/nre-130991

Kim, J., & Lee, H. (2018). The effect of action observation training on balance and sit to walk in chronic stroke: a crossover randomized controlled trial. Journal of Motor Behavior, 50(4), 373–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2017.1363697

Kim, K., Kim, Y. M., & Kim, E. K. (2014). Correlation between the activities of daily living of stroke patients in a community setting and their quality of life. Journal of Physical Therapy Science, 26(3), 417–419. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.26.417

Kleynen, M., Jie, L., Theunissen, K., Rasquin, S. M., Masters, R. S., Meijer, K., Beurskens, A. J., & Braun, S. M. (2019). The immediate influence of implicit motor learning strategies on spatiotemporal gait parameters in stroke patients: a randomized within-subjects design. Clinical Rehabilitation, 33(4), 619–630. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215518816359

Kollen, B., Van De Port, I., Lindeman, E., Twisk, J., & Kwakkel, G. (2005). Predicting improvement in gait after stroke. Stroke, 36(12), 2676–2680. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.0000190839.29234.50

Lee, D., Roh, H., Park, J., Lee, S., & Han, S. (2013). Drinking behavior training for stroke patients using action observation and practice of upper limb function. Journal of Physical Therapy Science, 25(5), 611–614. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.25.611

Lee, H. J., Kim, Y. M., & Lee, D. K. (2017). The effects of action observation training and mirror therapy on gait and balance in stroke patients. Journal of Physical Therapy Science, 29(3), 523–526. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.29.523

Livingston-Thomas, J., Nelson, P., Karthikeyan, S., Antonescu, S., Jeffers, M. S., Marzolini, S., & Corbett, D. (2016). Exercise and environmental enrichment as enablers of task-specific neuroplasticity and stroke recovery. Neurotherapeutics, 13(2), 395–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13311-016-0423-9

Moon, Y., & Bae, Y. (2019). Backward walking observational training improves gait ability in patients with chronic stroke: randomised controlled pilot study. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 42(3), 217–222. https://doi.org/10.1097/mrr.0000000000000352

Nakano, H., & Kodama, T. (2017). Understanding neural mechanisms of action observation for improving human motor skill acquisition. InTech eBooks, 69266. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.69266

Oh, S., Lee, J., & Kim, D. (2019). The effects of functional action-observation training on gait function in patients with post-stroke hemiparesis: A randomized controlled trial. Technology and Health Care, 27(2), 159–165. https://doi.org/10.3233/thc-181388

Park, E. C., & Hwangbo, G. (2015). The effects of action observation gait training on the static balance and walking ability of stroke patients. Journal of Physical Therapy Science, 27(2), 341–344. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.27.341

Park, H., Kim, J., Lee, M., & Oh, D. (2014). Clinical feasibility of action observation training for walking function of patients with post-stroke hemiparesis: a randomized controlled trial. Clinical Rehabilitation, 28(8), 794–803. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215514523145

Park, H., Oh, D., Choi, J., Kim, J., Kim, S., Cha, Y., & Jeon, S. (2017). Action observation training of community ambulation for improving walking ability of patients with post-stroke hemiparesis: a randomized controlled pilot trial. Clinical Rehabilitation, 31(8), 1078–1086. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215516671982

Peng, T., Zhu, J., Chen, C., Tai, R., Lee, C., & Hsieh, Y. (2019). Action observation therapy for improving arm function, walking ability, and daily activity performance after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Rehabilitation, 33(8), 1277–1285. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215519839108

Plata-Bello, J. (2017). The study of action observation therapy in neurological diseases: A few technical considerations. InTech eBooks, 67651. https://doi.org/10.5772/67651

Rizzolatti, G., & Sinigaglia, C. (2016). The mirror mechanism: a basic principle of brain function. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 17(12), 757–765. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2016.135

Rojasavastera, R., Bovonsunthonchai, S., Hiengkaew, V., & Senanarong, V. (2020). Action observation combined with gait training to improve gait and cognition in elderly with mild cognitive impairment A randomized controlled trial. Dementia & Neuropsychologia, 14(2), 118–127. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-57642020dn14-020004

Selves, C., Stoquart, G., & Lejeune, T. (2020). Gait rehabilitation after stroke: review of the evidence of predictors, clinical outcomes and timing for interventions. Acta Neurologica Belgica, 120(4), 783–790. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13760-020-01320-7

Sun, J., Tan, L., & Yu, J. (2014). Post-stroke cognitive impairment: epidemiology, mechanisms and management. Annals of Translational Medicine, 2(8), 80. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2305-5839.2014.08.05

Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Moher, D., Peters, M. D., Horsley, T., Weeks, L., Hempel, S., Akl, E. A., Chang, C., McGowan, J., Stewart, L., Hartling, L., Aldcroft, A., Wilson, M. G., Garritty, C., . . . Straus, S. E. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-SCR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/m18-0850

Downloads

Published

2024-06-21

How to Cite

Plijoly, L. P., Ahmedy, F., Hashim, N. M., Khin, N. Y., Payus, A. O., Daud, D. M. A. and Goh, C. X. H. (2024) “Effects of action observation therapy for gait training in stroke: a scoping review”, Neuroscience Research Notes, 7(2), pp. 304.1–304.13. doi: 10.31117/neuroscirn.v7i2.304.